'Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family & me as 'internationalists' & of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political & economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge,
I stand guilty, & I am proud of it.'
- David Rockefeller
For over ten years now I've been writing publicly about what I've found during my research into the machinations of man, his religions & society. Initially I joined Max Igan's 'Crowhouse' Forum around 2007, whilst listening avidly to Alan Watt, almost immediately & predictably I began spouting what I'd learned to my friends, thinking I'd hit upon something stupendous. However, to my astonishment, not one of them showed any interest in the subjects I was relaying to them & to my utter dismay some began the ridiculing. In fairness, seeing as I hadn't researched things thoroughly I was asking for trouble, I knew something was wrong & I thought I'd found the answer, but I was allowing others to do the talking for me which of course is bordering on parasitical & isn't what research is about so I deserved all I got in retrospect. It wasn't until I began listening to Bill Cooper that I realised what needed to be done & how to go about doing it. When I look back at those days I cringe thinking about it, yet really, I couldn't have found out any other way apart from making those basic errors, this is how we all learn. Ten years or so down the line I find myself the custodian of my own website having written some 60-odd blogs & still learning every day, which is the spark one needs to keep the fire lit as they say. Something hasn't changed though, my friends & family are still reticent to even mention my Blogbook,
far less contribute to it (apart from Craig). I still can't understand it fully, if one them had written publicly on current affairs, history, whatever & would encourage debate on it, I'd be in there with as much ammo as I could possibly muster.
Why is this?
The answer lies in one simple word……CONSPIRACY.
They've done a hell of a job as far as this is concerned. They've laced this word with such negative connotations that it's impossible to use it in common speech anymore without Conspiracy Theory springing to mind simultaneously. Of course this is the intent, but what also is being implied is more subtle, when people think of a Conspiracy Theory they associate it with the only persons being implicated in dark plots & nefarious schemes…….the secret societies. But as we all know, to slander, even question these people publicly will result in the ridicule of the theorist, whether he or she has produced ample information or evidence or not, people simply cower away from implicating secret societies because of the contrived, negative connotations associated with even the slightest mention of them. When I first began getting my feet wet in all this I witnessed one of their intimidation techniques first hand. I naively implicated Freemasonry to a Scottish barman in a pub I was playing one night, & he somewhat adroitly, raised an eyebrow & began backing away…..it was not nice, I didn't know how to handle it, there's an innate terror within human beings of being suspected of paranoia & by association mental illness, it's incredibly difficult to shake off once you've been suspected,
'Where there's smoke' & so on.
In any event, when I look into the mainstream media for examples & definitions of Conspiracy Theories, I always find attached to them the word; 'paranoia'.
From an article entitled;
'Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?',
BBC News (27 October 2013) states;
'Secret societies': Paranoia was rife in the 19th Century in the wake of the French revolution. British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (pictured) warned of "secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, & can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans". The article continues;
'It would be wrong to write off all conspiracy theorists as "swivel-eyed loons," with "poor personal hygiene & halitosis," he [Observer columnist & academic John Naughton] told a Cambridge University Festival of Ideas debate. They are not all "crazy". The difficult part, for those of us trying to make sense of a complex world, is working out which parts of the conspiracy theory to keep & which to throw away.'
They are correct, governments conspire at every stage of policy formulation, they secretly plot wars, especially in the UK & US & so on.
Take for example this excerpt from the BBC (18/3/03);
'British government officials forged documents to produce "fake news stories" during the Cold War, newly released files show. The Information Research Department (IRD) was the Foreign Office's secret propaganda unit. For 30 years it fed information to journalists & had its own news agencies too.'
'Propaganda units' deal in dis-information, & it's interesting to me at least that the BBC refers to the only Jewish-born
British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, I wonder why it didn't quote Winston Churchill who said;
'This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, & down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), & Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation & for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, & impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. [Nesta] Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.'
- Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920, pg. 5.
There we have it, according to this Freemasonic Conspiracy Theorist & 'Greatest Britain Of All Time' …..'It's The Jews'.
But it's NOT the Jews, they are just being blamed, mostly by surreptitious methods playing on the subconscious but also on occasion openly as in the case of Churchill. The above mentioned Spartacus-Weishaupt is the infamous founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, cited here by Winston as being behind the French Revolution which they & other factions of the Mystery Schools indeed were. As the BBC says,
it's about 'working out which parts of the conspiracy theory to keep & which to throw away.'
Language is a weapon. For example, certain words can be used as triggers, as in the case of Conspiracy (& Democracy), however there's much more to it than this;
'ca·bal | \ kə-ˈbäl, -ˈbal \Definition of cabal (Entry 1 of 2)
1: the contrived schemes of a group of persons secretly united in a plot (as to overturn a government) also : a group engaged in such schemes'
The Merriam Webster entry says the word Cabal was first used in 1614 although it doesn't say where. Coincidentally, 1614 was the year the first of the three Rosicrucian Manifestos was published, of the word Cabal, Google says;
'Origin late 16th century (denoting the Kabbalah): from French cabale, from medieval Latin cabala (see Kabbalah)'
As in the sacred word; Jahbulon in Freemasonry, 'Kabbalah', like Jahbulon incorporates three names of gods in three different languages, the Egyptian Ka, Phoenician Bal & the Arabic Allah. As Alan Watt suggests, to arrange & pronounce the names of gods in such a sequence is to have command over energies, thus
words have immense power & this is the basis of the Qabbala…….
Some of the process is described in the below broadcast by Bill Cooper, however midway through his revelations Coopers broadcast is cut off at the half hour mark for well over 10mins, nevertheless there are many links & enough references to be getting on with;
OK, so they're weaving their magic on us, literally. To illustrate the point further, the following is taken the man I consider to be the main author of 'Le Mystery des Cathedrales',
Aleister Crowley (Liber Samekh - 1930);
'He then that is as yet ignorant of that Name, let him repeat a word worthy of this particular Ritual. Such are Abrahadabra, the Word of the Aeon, which signifieth "The Great Work accomplished".
Think of how many times we heard that word growing up?
('h' may be pronounced 'ch' in our language as in 'Bach')
In his lecture; 'Words' (one of his last before he was murdered), Crowley disciple/protege (according to me) Manly Hall, uncharacteristically goes into a tirade about the deceptive language practices of the media, the education system, advertising companies, politicians etc etc, he even calls out the News for being
full of crap!
- - - - - - - - -
Cambridge Alumni include Aleister Crowley & Sir Francis Bacon, so if there's any place in the world qualified to host a Conspiracy Course, it's the favoured place of recruitment for MI6 itself, Cambridge University.
What we're dealing with here is the ancient art of 'Rhetoric', there are of course many other complicated facets at play but they may all come under that general heading, 'Rhetoric'. It's been used from Classical times to Modernity by every public speaker from the ancient Hierophant to the latter-day sports commentator.
Take the aforementioned
'Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?'
First of all, who are they asking? Do they not know? I thought they're the political correspondents not us?
Next, democracy is mob rule (See Brexit for results) according the Ancient Greeks & leads to Tyranny, it's just a system according to legendary British politician Tony Benn & the British public have sod-all influence on any change at election time or anywhere else in this system. Third, democracy is a code-word for socialism, according to Lenin, Marx, Engels, Gorbachev etc & lastly,
Democracy is the political arm of Freemasonry according to Freemasonry.
So if we take those four points & transform the BBC's question somewhat into what it could mean, we read;
'Are conspiracy theories destroying our plans to implement a tyranny
over the Profane?'
I doubt they're quaking in their boots just yet but that's an example of the kind of rhetorical spin they get up to, every day, & from a myriad of different angles, in fact, the statement could have a multitude of meanings & probably does because it usually does. You've heard of 'political correctness'? What used to be common words or figures of speech are now deemed 'Hate Crimes' no less & any mention of Conspiracy will soon be deemed, er….hateful in the very near future, they're just putting the final touches to it before it becomes
enshrined in Law.
'The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free & open society; & we are as a people inherently & historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths & to secret proceedings….For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic & ruthless conspiracy.'
- J. F. Kennedy, April 27, 1961
It used to be, the only people associated with Conspiracy ARE the secret societies or people on Remand, now it's paranoid schizophrenics with bad hygene.
'I have observed these doctrines gradually diffusing & mixing with all the different systems of Free Masonry; till, at last, AN ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN FORMED for the express purpose of ROOTING OUT ALL THE RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS, & OVERTURNING ALL THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTS OF EUROPE.......The Association of which I have been speaking, is the Order of ILLUMINATI, founded in 1775,
by Dr. Adam Weishaupt.'
- John Robison (Freemason)
'Proofs of a Conspiracy: Against all the Religions & Governments' (1798).
'At every period of time each has been in conflict with the other, with a variety & multiplicity of weapons & of warfare, although not always with equal ardour & assault. At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, & to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized & widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself. They are planning the destruction of holy Church publicly & openly, & this with the set purpose of utterly despoiling the nations of Christendom'
- HUMANUM GENUS
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII
ON FREEMASONRY (1884)
From pg 55 of Charles Heckethorn's; 'Secret Societies Of All Ages' (1897), under the chapter of 'Young Italy';
'In 1849, a society was discovered at Ancona calling itself the "Company of Death" & many assassinations, many of them committed in broad daylight in the streets of the town, were traced to it's members. The "Society of Slayers" Ammoazzatori, at Leghorn; the "Infernal Society," at Sinigaglia; the "Company of Assassins.' Sicarii, at Faenza; the "Terrorists" of Bologna, were associations off the same stamp. The "Barbers of Mazzini," at Rome, made it their business to "remove" priests who had rendered themselves particularly obnoxious. Another Bolognese society was that of the "Italian Conspiracy of the Sons of Death" whose object was the liberation of Italy from foreign sway….the war, begun by [Joseph] Mazzini & brought to a successful issue chiefly through Garibaldi, ended in the establishment of the Kingdom of Italy, & the overthrow - for ever, it is to be hoped - of the Popes temporal powers.'
'About the explanation the ritual (Masonic) & of the history & of the confessions of the Order there is reason to believe that Freemasonry is a conspiracy against the altar, the throne & property, with the purpose of establishing upon the face of the earth a socialist & theocratic rule, whose religious & political government would have it's headquarters
- Eduard Emil Eckert (a German);
'La Franc Maçonnerie dans sa Veritable Signification', Vol I, pg. 280
See also by Eckert; 'Collection of Evidence for the Condemnation of Freemasonry as the Principle of all Guilty Cases Attempting to Destroy Religion, State, Family, & Property by Cunning, Treason, & Treason violence'.
'I repeat: It is not an economic revolution which forms the plan of the real directors of the movement, it is not even the "directorship of the proletariat" nor the reorganisation of society by the intelligentsia of the "Worker"; it is the destruction of the Christian idea. The socialist orators can break out in invectives against the corrupt aristocracy or the "bloated capitalists", but is it not these who will suffer most once the conspiracy is completely achieved? World revolution has always shown itself indulgent for & with the corrupt & egoistic, from the Marquis of Sade & the Duke of Orleans [Illuminati] until now…...The manner in which the women of this country have been enlisted in the service of the conspiracy can also be traced to illuminized Freemasonry. Just as in the first French Revolution the advocates of "Women's Rights" were persuaded to throw themselves into the movement, so the conspiracy to-day has succeeded in capturing a large proportion of the "Feminist" movement for it's purpose of general demoralisation.'
- Nesta Webster 'World Revolution' (1921)
'It was impossible to unfold to the people the conspiracy of the Templars against the Thrones & the Tiara. It was impossible to expose to them the doctrines of the Chiefs of the Order. [This would have been to initiate the multitude into the secrets of the Masters, & to have uplifted the veil of Isis….The Initiates, in fact, thought in the eighteenth century that their time had arrived, some to found a new Hierarchy, others to overturn all authority, & to press down all the summits of the Social Order under the level of Equality….The Rose-Croix Adepts respected the dominant, hierarchical, & revealed religion. Consequently they could no more be the enemies of the Papacy than of legitimate Monarchy; & if they conspired against the Popes & Kings, it was because they considered them personally as apostates from duty & supreme favorers of anarchy….Cagliostro was the Agent of the Templars, & therefore wrote to the Free-Masons of London that the time had come to begin the work of re-building the Temple of the Eternal. He had introduced into Masonry a new Rite called the Egyptian, & endeavored to resuscitate the mysterious worship of Isis. The three letters L∴ P∴ D∴ on his seal, were the initials of the words "Lilia pedibus destrue;" tread under foot the Lilies [of France], & a Masonic medal of the sixteenth or seventeenth century has upon it a sword cutting off the stalk of a lily, & the words "talem dabit ultio messem," such harvest revenge will give.
A Lodge inaugurated under the auspices of Rousseau, the fanatic of Geneva, became the centre of the revolutionary movement in France, & a Prince of the blood-royal went thither to swear the destruction of the successors of Philippe le Bel on the tomb of Jacques de Molai. The registers of the Order of Templars attest that the Regent, the Duc d’Orleans, was Grand Master of that formidable Secret Society, & that his successors were the Duc de Maine, the Prince of Bourbon-Condé, & the Duc de Cossé-Brissac.
The Templars compromitted the King; they saved him from the rage of the People, to exasperate that rage & bring on the catastrophe prepared for centuries; it was a scaffold that the vengeance of the Templars demanded. The secret movers of the French Revolution had sworn to overturn the Throne & the Altar upon the Tomb of Jacques de Molai. When Louis XVI. was executed, half the work was done; & thenceforward the Army of the Temple was to direct all its efforts against the Pope.'
Said Freemasonic Pontiff Albert Pike in;
'Morals & Dogma' (1872)
Conspiracy? What Conspiracy? Strange the BBC makes no mention of all this eh? In any event, I suppose the revenge of the Templars upon 'Thrones & Altars' does not actually constitute a Conspiracy if they fully document & publish it as they have done time & again. Incidentally, it was on November 22nd 1307, Pope Clement V issued the papal bull which instructed all Christian monarchs in Europe to arrest the Knights Templars.
On November 22nd 1962, JFK, the one & only Catholic President of the United States, was murdered in an outdoor Pagan Temple,
& thus began the modern day phenomenon of…...
The Conspiracy Theory.