'Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family & me as 'internationalists' & of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political & economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge,
I stand guilty, & I am proud of it.'
- David Rockefeller
Whilst growing up I overheard some sound advice, it read;
'Don't believe what you read in the papers.'
Another later one was; 'Never trust a politician'.
For over ten years now I've been writing publicly about what I've found during my research into the machinations of man, his religions & society. Initially I joined Max Igan's 'Crowhouse' Forum around 2008, whilst listening avidly to Alan Watt. Almost immediately & predictably I began spouting what I'd learned to my friends, thinking I'd hit upon something stupendous. However, to my astonishment, not one of them showed any interest in the subjects I was relaying to them & to my utter dismay some began the ridiculing. In fairness, seeing as I hadn't researched things thoroughly I was asking for trouble, I knew something was wrong & thought I'd found the answer, but I was allowing others to do the talking for me which of course is bordering on parasitical & isn't what research is about so I deserved all I got in retrospect. It wasn't until I began listening to Bill Cooper that I realised what needed to be done & how to go about doing it. When I look back at those days I cringe thinking about it, yet really, I couldn't have found out any other way other than making those basic errors, this is how we all learn. Ten years or so down the line I find myself the custodian of my own website having written some 60-odd blogs & still learning every day, which is the spark one needs to keep the fire lit as they say. Something hasn't changed though, my friends & family are still reticent to even mention my Blogbook,
far less contribute to it (apart from Craig). I still can't understand it fully, if one of them had written publicly on current affairs, history, whatever & would encourage debate on it, I'd be in there with as much ammo as I could possibly muster.
Why is this?
The answer lies in one simple word
'To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.'
- Voltaire (& it isn't the Jews)
They've done a hell of a job as far as this one's concerned.
They've laced this word with such negative connotations that it's impossible to use it in common speech anymore without Conspiracy Theory springing to mind simultaneously. Of course this is the intent, but what also is being implied is more subtle, when people think of a Conspiracy Theory they associate it with the only persons being implicated in dark plots & nefarious schemes…….the secret societies.
But as we all know, to slander, even question these people publicly will result in the ridicule of the conspiracy theorist (for that is what one becomes if we criticise them), whether he or she has provided ample information or evidence or not, people simply cower away from implicating secret societies because of the contrived, negative connotations associated with even the slightest mention of them.
When I first began getting my feet wet in all this I witnessed one of their intimidation techniques first hand. I naively implicated Freemasonry to a Scottish barman in a pub I was playing in one night, & he somewhat adroitly, raised an eyebrow & began backing away…..it was not nice, I didn't know how to handle it, there's an innate terror within human beings of being suspected of paranoia & by association mental illness, it's incredibly difficult to shake off once you've been suspected,
'Where there's smoke' & so on.
The situation is this, my friends & family think of me as a
for the reasons outlined above.
Is there any truth to their fears? I suppose the professional psychologist would think of the modern-day phenomenon of the
Conspiratorialist as a symptom or an effect of a negative constitutional projection onto a complex world by a confused & frightened, child-like mind.
Does that apply to me? In a way yes, however my answer would be,
if it did, what created the situation in the first place?
Something must have. My family is riddled with psychological difficulties, but none of them share my arguments & explanations as to why we are the way we are.
My stance is; always find out the CAUSE of what created these traumas, in our case it was the British Intelligence engineered, Border War in Northern Ireland in the 1950's, with the compliance of those at the heads of the Irish Republican & Unionist factions,
who we've proven time & again on this site & on my Youtube video…..are Freemasons, all working towards a Utopian, Pagan,
Socialistic, One-World Order, as David Rockefeller has outlined.
So I began studying the vast, occult subject of Freemasonry, & found it to be at the fountainhead of almost every arts, scientific, religious & political movement there's ever been including psychology, it's led me into the dark halls of witchcraft, Buddhism, Pythagorean maths, Ancient Babylon, you name it
….& I just love researching these subjects.
There you go, problem solved, catharsis in operation,
see ya later! (with the help of God)
Now the real trouble begins. In my searchings, I've found much deception, especially in history, despite those in power openly admitting they change things to suit, 'the ends justify the means' is how they put it. So not only am I a Conspiracy Theorist, but I'm a Holocaust Denier to boot. Again, you present me with the evidence ONE Jew was ever gassed by the Germans in a gas chamber & we'll discuss it here…..but I bet you can't. I only say that because it's taught in our schools today that the Germans gassed millions of our Judaic brethren. & today, if you maintain such a stance, you're branded an Anti Semite, even though many Jews don't believe it either…but here's the kick, Semite is a word invented in GERMANY during the late 18th Cen (i.e. the time of the Enlightenment, Illuminati & French Revolution) in reference to the language the Arabic Peoples spoke, it never existed anywhere before, only after WWII did it begin to become a term in reference to Jews alone. Not only that, Nazi is a Jewish term which stretches back 1000's of years, the Germans of the 3rd Reich never referred to themselves......as Nazi.
So I hope you can see my predicament, there's something happening here & those who see through it are shot down.
(the reasons for this I delineate on my other Blogs on those subjects)
When I look into the mainstream media for examples & definitions of Conspiracy Theories, I always find attached to them the word; 'paranoia'.
From an article entitled;
'Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?',
BBC News (27 October 2013) states;
'Secret societies': Paranoia was rife in the 19th Century in the wake of the French revolution. British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (pictured) warned of "secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, & can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans".
The article continues;
'It would be wrong to write off all conspiracy theorists as "swivel-eyed loons," with "poor personal hygiene & halitosis," he [Observer columnist & academic John Naughton] told a Cambridge University Festival of Ideas debate. They are not all "crazy". The difficult part, for those of us trying to make sense of a complex world, is working out which parts of the conspiracy theory to keep & which to throw away.'
They are correct, all governments conspire at every stage of policy formulation, they secretly plot, budgets, housing schemes, cuts, wars, especially in the UK & US & so on.
Take for example this excerpt from the BBC (18/3/03);
'British government officials forged documents to produce "fake news stories" during the Cold War, newly released files show. The Information Research Department (IRD) was the Foreign Office's secret propaganda unit. For 30 years it fed information to journalists & had its own news agencies too.'
'Propaganda units' deal in dis-information, & its interesting to me at least that the BBC refers to the only Jewish-born
British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, I wonder why it didn't quote Britains 'Greatest er... Britain', Winston Churchill who said;
'This movement [Communism] among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, & down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), & Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation & for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, & impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. [Nesta] Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable
part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.'
- Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920, pg. 5.
There we have it, according to this Freemasonic Conspiracy Theorist & 'Greatest Britain Of All Time' …..'It's The Jews'.
But it's NOT the Jews, they are just being blamed, mostly by surreptitious methods playing on the subconscious but also on occasion openly as in the case of Churchill. The above mentioned Spartacus-Weishaupt is the infamous founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, cited here by Winston as being behind the French Revolution which they & other factions of the Mystery Schools indeed were. As the BBC says,
it's about 'working out which parts of the conspiracy theory to keep & which to throw away.'
Language is a weapon. For example, certain words can be used as triggers, as in the case of Conspiracy (& Democracy), however there's much more to it than this;
'ca·bal | \ kə-ˈbäl, -ˈbal \Definition of cabal (Entry 1 of 2)
1: the contrived schemes of a group of persons secretly united in a plot (as to overturn a government) also : a group
engaged in such schemes'
The Merriam Webster entry says the word Cabal was first used in 1614 although it doesn't say where. Coincidentally, 1614 was the year the first of the three Rosicrucian Manifestos was published,
of the word Cabal, Google says;
'Origin late 16th century (denoting the Kabbalah): from French cabale, from medieval Latin cabala (see Kabbalah)'
As in the sacred word; Jahbulon in Freemasonry, 'Kabbalah', like Jahbulon incorporates three names of gods in three different languages, the Egyptian Ka, Phoenician Bal & the Arabic Allah. As Alan Watt suggests, to arrange & pronounce the names of gods in such a triangulated sequence (which is the basis of Greek Mythology) is to have command over energies, thus
words have immense power & this is the basis of the Qabbala…….
'TRIANGLE OF MANIFESTATION is a phrase indicating the principle behind magical manifestation. This basic principle is rooted in the number three. According to metaphysics, in order to manifest something, three components must come together. These components are time, space & energy. Accordingly, if one selects a space, & a time, & then directs energy there,
a manifestation occurs.'
- Raven Grimassi Encyclopaedia Of Wicca & Witchcraft (2000).
Some of the process is described in the below
broadcast by Bill Cooper;
OK, so they're weaving their magic on us, literally. To illustrate the point further, the following is taken from the man I consider to be the main author of 'Le Mystery des Cathedrales',
Aleister Crowley (Liber Samekh - 1930);
'He then that is as yet ignorant of that Name, let him repeat a word worthy of this particular Ritual. Such are Abrahadabra, the Word of the Aeon, which signifieth "The Great Work accomplished".
Think of how many times we heard that word growing up?
('h' may be pronounced 'ch' in our language as in 'Bach')
In his lecture; 'Words' (shortly before he was murdered), Crowley disciple/protege (according to me) Manly Hall, uncharacteristically goes into a tirade about the deceptive use of language practices in the media, the education system, advertising companies, politicians etc etc,
he even calls out the News for being….
full of crap!
Cambridge Alumni include Aleister Crowley & Sir Francis Bacon, so if there's any place in the world qualified to host a Conspiracy Course, it's the favoured place of recruitment for MI6 itself…..
What we're dealing with here, in part, is the ancient art of 'Rhetoric', there are of course many other complicated facets at play but they may all come under that general heading, 'Rhetoric'. It's been used from Classical times to Modernity by every public speaker from the ancient Hierophant to the latter-day sports commentator.
Take the aforementioned
'Are conspiracy theories destroying democracy?'
First of all, who are they asking? Do they not know? I thought they're the political correspondents not us?
Next, democracy is mob rule (See Brexit for results) according to the ancient Greek philosophers (especially Plato) it leads to Tyranny, it's just a system according to legendary British politician Tony Benn & the British public have sod-all influence on any change at election time or anywhere else in this system. Third, democracy is a code-word for socialism, according to Lenin, Marx, Engels, Gorbachev etc & lastly,
Democracy is the political arm of Freemasonry according to Freemasonry (See my videos of Manly Hall
discussing this subject).
Incidentally, next time you check the news headlines on the internet, count how many stories start with a question.....
....a rhetorical question.
So if we take those four points & transform the BBC's question somewhat into what it could mean, we read;
'Are conspiracy theories destroying our plans to implement a tyranny over the Profane?'
I doubt they're quaking in their boots just yet but that's an example of the kind of spin they get up to, every day, & from a myriad of different angles, in fact, the statement could have a multitude of meanings & probably does because it usually does. Furthermore, have you noticed how exacerbated a newsreader becomes when delivering the first headline especially?? One would expect they're used to telling bad news by now seeing it's almost every night but no, they still get really upset, it's as though they were telling us a story of their own family & friends.
Worse still, these bad vibes must be getting to the weather people on the same shows as well, as they're becoming increasingly upset over climate change now,
just shows you eh?
You've heard of 'political correctness'? What used to be common words or figures of speech are now deemed 'Hate Crimes' no less & any mention of Conspiracy will soon be deemed, er….hateful in the very near future, they're just putting the final touches to it before it becomes enshrined in Law.....
'The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free & open society; & we are as a people inherently & historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths & to secret proceedings….For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic & ruthless conspiracy.'
- J. F. Kennedy, April 27, 1961
In 1614, the Faternity of the Rose Cross (Rosicrucians) issued a Manifesto, in which they declared;
'A General Reformation Of The World'. They openly admitted to be being behind the Protestant Reformation, the creation of the United States, the French Revolution & so on. The Communist Manifesto (1848) & the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion (circa 1890)
were also issued by these guys,
'The Fraternity of R.C. is an august & sovereign body, arbitrarily manipulating the symbols of alchemy [See the Hall video above], Qabbalism, astrology, & magic to the attainment of its own peculiar purposes, but entirely independent of the cults whose terminology it employs. The three major objects of the Fraternity are:
1. The abolition of all monarchical forms of government & the substitution therefor of the rulership of the philosophic elect. The present democracies are the direct outgrowth of Rosicrucian efforts to liberate the maws from the domination of despotism…..The Rosicrucians were also the instigators of the French Revolution…..2. The reformation of science, philosophy, & ethics….There is undeniable evidence that the Rosicrucians desired to reestablish the institutions of the ancient Mysteries as the foremost method of instructing humanity in the secret & eternal doctrine. Indeed, being in all probability the perpetuators of the ancient Mysteries, the Rosicrucians were able to maintain themselves against the obliterating forces of dogmatic Christianity only by absolute secrecy & the subtlety of their subterfuges…3. The discovery of the Universal Medicine, or panacea, for all forms of disease'
The response from Christendom to these acts of WAR have, as one would expect, been the object of universal ridicule, nevertheless,
it was stated & documented with the utmost assiduity by both the Church & State;
'I have observed these doctrines gradually diffusing & mixing with all the different systems of Free Masonry; till, at last, AN ASSOCIATION HAS BEEN FORMED for the express purpose of ROOTING OUT ALL THE RELIGIOUS ESTABLISHMENTS, & OVERTURNING ALL THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTS OF EUROPE.......The Association of which I have been speaking, is the Order of ILLUMINATI,
founded in 1775,
by Dr. Adam Weishaupt.'
- John Robison (Freemason)
'Proofs of a Conspiracy: Against all the Religions & Governments' (1798)
'At every period of time each has been in conflict with the other, with a variety & multiplicity of weapons & of warfare, although not always with equal ardour & assault. At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, & to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized & widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself. They are planning the destruction of holy Church publicly & openly, & this with the set purpose of utterly despoiling the nations of Christendom'
- HUMANUM GENUS
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII
ON FREEMASONRY (1884)
'In 1849, a society was discovered at Ancona calling itself the "Company of Death" & many assassinations, many of them committed in broad daylight in the streets of the town, were traced to it's members. The "Society of Slayers" Ammoazzatori, at Leghorn; the "Infernal Society,"
at Sinigaglia; the "Company of Assassins.' Sicarii, at Faenza; the "Terrorists" of Bologna, were associations off the same stamp. The "Barbers of Mazzini," at Rome, made it their business to "remove" priests who had rendered themselves particularly obnoxious. Another Bolognese society was that of the "Italian Conspiracy of the Sons of Death" whose object was the liberation of Italy from foreign sway….the war, begun by [Joseph] Mazzini & brought to a successful issue chiefly through Garibaldi, ended in the establishment of the Kingdom of Italy, & the overthrow - for ever, it is to be hoped -
of the Popes temporal powers......Indeed, one of the most obvious sentiments that gives rise to secret societies is that of revenge,
but good & wise revenge....'
Charles Heckethorn - Secret Societies Of All Ages (1897)
'About the explanation the ritual (Masonic) & of the history & of the confessions of the Order there is reason to believe that Freemasonry is a conspiracy against the altar, the throne & property, with the purpose of establishing upon the face of the earth a socialist & theocratic rule, whose religious & political government would have it's headquarters
- Eduard Emil Eckert (a German);
'La Franc Maçonnerie dans sa Veritable Signification', Vol I, pg. 280
See also by Eckert; 'Collection of Evidence for the Condemnation of Freemasonry as the Principle of all Guilty Cases Attempting to Destroy Religion, State, Family, & Property by Cunning, Treason, & Treason violence'
'I repeat: It is not an economic revolution which forms the plan of the real directors of the movement, it is not even the "directorship of the proletariat" nor the reorganisation of society by the intelligentsia of the "Worker"; it is the destruction of the Christian idea. The socialist orators can break out in invectives against the corrupt aristocracy or the "bloated capitalists", but is it not these who will suffer most once the conspiracy is completely achieved? World revolution has always shown itself indulgent for & with the corrupt & egoistic, from the Marquis of Sade & the Duke of Orleans [Illuminati] until now…...The manner in which the women of this country have been enlisted in the service of the conspiracy can also be traced to illuminized Freemasonry. Just as in the first French Revolution the advocates of "Women's Rights" were persuaded to throw themselves into the movement, so the conspiracy to-day has succeeded in capturing a large proportion of the "Feminist" movement for it's purpose of general demoralisation.'
- Nesta Webster (mentioned by Churchill above)
'World Revolution' (1921)
'Most of the organised craftsmen of the Middle Ages were nominal Christians, in many respects outstanding for their personal piety & devotion. They differed principally in the degree & quality of the interpretations of the Christian dispensation. In a day of almost continuous strife & conspiracy, they dwelt together in cooperation & amity [see my Democracy Blog]. These associations had discovered a working formula for the practice of liberty, equality & charity. The guilds continued as important forces in character building until machinery terminated the apprenticeship system.'
- Manly Hall - Masonic Orders Of Fraternity (1950).
'5 Things Marx Wanted to Abolish (Besides Private Property)
1. The Family Marx admits that destroying the family is a thorny topic, even for revolutionaries. “Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists,” he writes.....
2. Individuality Marx believed individuality was antithetical to the egalitarianism he envisioned. Therefore, the “individual” must “be swept out of the way, & made impossible.”......
3. Eternal Truths Marx did not appear to believe that any truth existed beyond class struggle. “The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class,” he argued. “When the ancient world was in its last throes, the ancient religions were overcome by Christianity. When Christian ideas succumbed in the 18th century to rationalist ideas, feudal society fought its death battle with the then revolutionary bourgeoisie.” He recognized how radical this idea would sound to his readers, particularly since Communism does not seek to modify truth, but to overthrow it......
4. Nations Communists, Marx said, are reproached for seeking to abolish countries. These people fail to understand the nature of the proletariat, he wrote. “The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois
sense of the word.”....
5. The Past Marx saw tradition as a tool of the bourgeoisie. Adherence to the past served as a mere distraction in proletariat’s quest for emancipation & supremacy. “In bourgeois society,” Marx wrote, “the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past.”
'It was impossible to unfold to the people the conspiracy of the Templars against the Thrones & the Tiara. It was impossible to expose to them the doctrines of the Chiefs of the Order. [This would have been to initiate the multitude into the secrets of the Masters, & to have uplifted the veil of Isis….] The Initiates, in fact, thought in the eighteenth century that their time had arrived, some to found a new Hierarchy, others to overturn all authority, & to press down all the summits of the Social Order under the level of Equality….The Rose-Croix Adepts respected the dominant, hierarchical, & revealed religion. Consequently they could no more be the enemies of the Papacy than of legitimate Monarchy; & if they conspired against the Popes & Kings, it was because they considered them personally as apostates from duty & supreme favorers of anarchy….Cagliostro was the Agent of the Templars, & therefore wrote to the Free-Masons of London that the time had come to begin the work of re-building the Temple of the Eternal. He had introduced into Masonry a new Rite called the Egyptian, & endeavored to resuscitate the mysterious worship of Isis. The three letters L∴ P∴ D∴ on his seal, were the initials of the words "Lilia pedibus destrue;" tread under foot the Lilies [of France], & a Masonic medal of the sixteenth or seventeenth century has upon it a sword cutting off the stalk of a lily, & the words "talem dabit ultio messem," such harvest revenge will give.
A Lodge inaugurated under the auspices of Rousseau, the fanatic of Geneva, became the centre of the revolutionary movement in France, & a Prince of the blood-royal went thither to swear the destruction of the successors of Philippe le Bel on the tomb of Jacques de Molai. The registers of the Order of Templars attest that the Regent, the Duc d’Orleans, was Grand Master of that formidable Secret Society, & that his successors were the Duc de Maine, the Prince of Bourbon-Condé, & the Duc de Cossé-Brissac.
The Templars compromitted the King; they saved him from the rage of the People, to exasperate that rage & bring on the catastrophe prepared for centuries; it was a scaffold that the vengeance of the Templars demanded. The secret movers of the French Revolution had sworn to overturn the Throne & the Altar upon the Tomb of Jacques de Molai. When Louis XVI. was executed, half the work was done; & thenceforward the Army of the Temple was to direct all its efforts against the Pope.'
Said Freemasonic Pontiff Albert Pike in;
Morals & Dogma (1872)
Incidentally, much of Pike's Morals & Dogma was borrowed from French Mage Eliphas Levis work; 'Magic, its Doctrine & Ritual' (1854-6), wherein he delineates the history of the war between the Church, the French Throne & the Knights Templar, & the conspiracy of the Templars to enact revenge, he calls it a conspiracy.
Conspiracy? What Conspiracy? Strange the BBC makes no mention of any of this eh? Incidentally, under the entry of
SPECULATIVE FREEMASONRY, (i.e. modern Masonry)
Mackey's Encyclopaedia Of Freemasonry (1873) notes;
'The word Speculative is used by Freemasons in its primary sense as symbolic, or theoretical, when opposed to Operative.'
'Definition of speculative 1: involving, based on, or constituting intellectual speculation also : theoretical rather than demonstrable'
As I've discussed many times, probably the best source one could hope for regarding the conspiracy General Albert Pike et al speak of is Pike's fellow Freemason Manly Palmer Hall. Hall's 'Freemasonry Of The Ancient Egyptians' (1937) spells out the same plan for revenge, dating back to when the Catholic Church was formed in the 4th Cen AD & put the Mysteries underground (sub-rosa)
so to speak, & using the ancient myth of the Egyptian deities, Osiris, Isis & Horus as symbols for the Mystery Schools (Templars etc), Osiris' brother Typhon (or Set) is used for Christianity, in particular the Catholic Church;
'The causing of Osiris to breathe again is the great abstract ideal. The second & more imminent motive which actuated Isis was to avenge herself upon Typhon & destroy his power over world. This she determined to accomplish through her immaculately conceived son, Horus, a term concealing the collective body of the perfected adepts who were born again out of the womb of the Mother—Isis, the Mystery School.
We can apply this analogy to a great modern system of initiation, Freemasonry, which has certainly perpetuated at least the outer form of the ancient rites. Freemasonry as an institution is Isis, the Mother of Mysteries, from whose dark womb the Initiates are born in the mystery of the second or philosophic birth…...
In the Egyptian rites Horus is the savior-avenger, son of Isis, conceived by magic (the ritual) after the brutal murder of Osiris. Hence, he is the posthumous redeemer. Freemasons are Hori, they are the eye of Osiris, whose body therefore, is made up of eyes. Each Initiate is a Horus, each is a hawk of the sun, & for one reason is each raised & that is that he may join the army which is to avenge the destruction of wisdom, & restore the reign of the all-seeing lord. Each one is dedicated to the over-throwing of the reign of Typhon. The great battle, in which the sons of the hawk rout the hosts of darkness, is the mysterious Armageddon of Revelation, the Kurukshetra of the Mahabharata & the Ragnarok of the Eddas. In this battle the host of the Adversary shall be routed forever.'
What gets me is, they repeatedly refer to Typhon's (Christianity) overthrow of Osiris (The Mysteries) as a….conspiracy;
'In the meantime Typhon, brother or half-brother of Osiris, had ambition to usurp the throne, but the vigilant Isis, sister- wife of Osiris, was too watchful. Typhon, however, having persuaded seventy-two other persons to join him in his conspiracy, with the aid of a certain queen in Ethiopia named Aso, perfected a plot against Osiris. ' (Hall - ibid)
'They have a talent for turning things around' - Bill Cooper.
(For a history of these stories see my Illuminati & Catholic Church Blogs)
Co-incidentally, it was on November 22nd 1307, Pope Clement V issued the papal bull which instructed all Christian monarchs in Europe to arrest the Knights Templars.
On November 22nd 1963, JFK, the one & only Catholic President of the United States, was murdered in an outdoor Pagan Temple,
& thus began the modern day phenomenon of…...
The Conspiracy Theory.
(For a full explanation of Hall's interpretation of the Osiris legend see Bill Cooper's; mystery babylon 3.mp3)
Right; from Eliphas Levi's A History Of Magic....
Left; taken from Viscount Leon De Poncins 1929 work;
'The Secret Powers Behind Revolution'
- - - - - - - -
By Lea Cohen;
'it is important to remember that the concept of CONSPIRACY THEORY was created by… CIA in 1967.
Indeed, as the old English proverb goes,
“FIRST GIVE A DOG A BAD NAME, THEN HANG IT”
In 1967, the CIA Created the Label “Conspiracy Theorists” … to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the “Official” Narrative.
Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” — short for “psychological operations” or disinformation — and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.
The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.
The dispatch states:
2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.
3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:
a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by … propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.
4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:
a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider.
b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent–and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) …
c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc.
d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other.
f. As to charges that the Commission’s report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.
g. Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” can always be explained in some natural way ….
5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission’s Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.”