The Leo Taxil Affair
Those of you familiar with the history of Freemasonry should be well aware of the Leo Taxil debacle of 1890's France. The subject has always intrigued me as to what it was really about, because without anything to go on apart from the usual Masonic propaganda (& without having read Taxil's infamous exposé), me, like everyone else had to speculate on what we believed to be the truth of the matter, such was the sophistication of the veil placed over this story. However, after reading the Rev. Fr Edward Cahill's footnotes on the subject in his 1929 classic;
'Freemasonry & The Anti-Christian Movement',
I no longer believe that Taxil et al were telling the truth & were forced to retract their debauched tale, instead, I'm now convinced the whole thing was one of the first examples of
....DIS-INFO....& PSY-OP's of the modern era....
So first things first, France in the 1890's, what else was going on in the world of literature? For one, the Protocols Of Zion documents (Cahill spells it 'Sion') had just emerged from a French Masonic Lodge & were now being circulated around Europe. Two, the Priory Of Sion documents had just been discovered (1891) by French priest Bérenger Saunière in the south-west of the country. Incidentally, elsewhere in 1897,
the first international Zionist Congress was convened
in Basle, Switzerland
.....thus, bullshit distribution was as rife then as it is now,
only it was bullshit with a mission, or perhaps a
We don't need to give illustrations of Freemasonry's connections to the Devil/Satan/Lucifer as my Blogbook is full of them, what I will reiterate is when Bérenger Saunière built his church in Rennes le Chateaux with the money he'd received after finding the Priory documents, he placed a statue of Satan at the door as you go in, suffice to say, the Devil plays a role in the Priory Of Sion story as
of course it does in the Taxil. Moreover, Sihyun/Sion/Zion is the Arabic pronunciation of the ancient Aramaic; Salem, as in Jeru-salem. The local god Salem was the Evening star, & in Freemasonry the Evening Star is the Devil. So Zionism is simply Satanism, the Priory Of Sion is the Church Of Satan etc... According to the people who popularised the Priory Of Sion tale, those originally behind it formed a group of warrior monks called the (Crusading) Knights Templar, who still exist in the form of Freemasonry.
'The symbol of Baphomet was used by the Knights Templar to represent Satan.' - Anton Lavey The Satanic Bible (1966).
& what is Zionism?
It's primarily a belief in a divine right to the Holy Land, so we have Sionists in the Middle Ages demanding control of Palestine ostensibly in the name of Christianity,
then we have Zionists 100's of years later
claiming the same thing, only this time under the banner of Judaism.....but we now know it was neither Christianity nor Judaism behind these ungodly events.
When we read the infamous Protocols (see below image), we find they're just as much a Masonic document as Jewish, but we never hear of that part eh? Rev Cahill states; 'Whatever be the genesis of the affair it is certain the too-ready credence given to the fantastic inventions which Taxil's writings contained helped to discredit many things of which there was otherwise reliable evidence.'
In other words, the Taxil case contaminated enquiry into Freemasonry from then on, purposely implies Cahill.
Any subsequent in/enquiry would evoke or perhaps invoke (remember we're dealing with Magicians here)
a raised eyebrow, hence the dearth of reference to Masonry in connection to the Protocols from then on,
'Despite countless exposures of the Protocols as a fraud, the myth of a Jewish world conspiracy has retained incredible power for Nazis & others who seek to spread hatred of Jews.'
That's just one aspect of a vast area of Masonic propaganda of the period & how dis-info works on the public psyche & how it acts as a foundation stone for other blocks of hypnotic mind-control
to be built upon. Remember also that their docrtines have to be externalised so they're eventually adopted by everyone & this is one means by which it's achieved, I'd assume less people would have read or read about what Taxil wrote were it not for the
public relations campaign it received.
- - - - -
In my last vid on the war between Freemasonry & the
Catholic Church someone quickly seized on the fact that Wikipedia says Rev Cahill was a Jesuit. I don't know whether he was or not as his book never mentions it, however, Cahill's book is nearly a 100yrs old, the Jesuit Order was not under the scrutiny it is today, thus its leadership (like the I.R.A.) could act with relative impunity from suspicion from within its own ranks or from without.
It could not have survived in that manner however if every one of its members KNEW the Jesuit leadership were in league with the Pagan Mystery Schools, the ranks of Freemasonry the same, most don't know anything about its history, doctrines etc...
but they're still Freemasons who carry
on about their daily business oblivious.
& what if Rev Cahill was an insider? It would just be another piece of propaganda put out by the Freemasons, a smokescreen if you like to ultimately hamper or discredit investigation into them even further, but I can't see it myself. In any event, being humans we all make mistakes, maybe he believed in Socialism? Again I haven't read enough of him to make a judgement on it, alls I know is,
I think he got it spot on with the Leo Taxil affair,
& I for one am glad he did, whatever his motives for doing so.
What is NEWS?
'British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), publicly financed broadcasting system in Great Britain, operating under royal charter. It held a monopoly on television in Great Britain from its introduction until 1954 & on radio until 1972. Headquarters are in the Greater London borough of Westminster.
The first initiatives in British radio after World War I were taken by commercial firms that regarded broadcasting primarily as point-to-point communications. The British Broadcasting Company, Ltd., was established in 1922 as a private corporation, in which only British manufacturers were permitted to hold shares. In 1925, upon recommendation of a parliamentary committee, the company was liquidated & replaced in 1927 by a public corporation, the British Broadcasting Corporation. Although ultimately answerable to Parliament, the BBC has virtually complete independence in the conduct of its activities. The British monarch appoints the members of the BBC Trust, an independent 12-member panel, governed by a chairman, that oversees day-to-day operations.'
It's some guys with microphones & an airwave or internet channel through which to disseminate whatever they want as long as it doesn't breach a set of codes drawn up by the government,
Leave a Reply.